The morality of parking on college campuses

As part of an opportunity to build their own business, with start-up funds provided by a commercial bank, a group of students at Hofstra’s business school auctioned off twenty parking spaces for two months to the highest bidders, with bids beginning at $50.

This simple exercise raises several ethical questions: is it legitimate for the university to approve of a student project that impacts the university as a whole; is it fair for some students to pay for reserved parking spaces while others scramble for theirs; what student services are essential for college life and should be offered equally to all?

First, it seems to me that when a class engages in an exercise, it shouldn’t be at the expense of other students. In this instance, it clearly affected the lives of those who needed parking spaces at school. Twenty free spots were now gone. If the university wants to experiment with parking fees for parking, then this should have been presented as a university policy, not turned over to a few students to support their “quest for knowledge,” as explained by Patrick Socci, dean of the business school.

Let’s say I think it’s educationally beneficial for my students to use the quadrangle in front of a building for the next two months, put up desks al fresco under the assumption that sunlight increases student learning but in so doing this experiment deprives others from sitting on the benches or crossing the square. This wouldn’t be fair and people would rightly be upset.

Policy around parking is worth looking at, though. Hofstra’s policy of free parking isn’t universal. Here faculty, administration and students obtain permits from public safety at no cost, then park anywhere in designated spots. Some of those places are reserved exclusively either for administration or faculty.

There may be an ethical justification to change the overall approach. After all, only those who live in dorms are charged for living in them.  Student housing isn’t free, so I’m not sure why student parking should be. Non-car users don’t subsidize dorm users and I don’t see why those who pay for dorms should subsidize those who commute by car.

I’m also not sure that faculty and administrators should be in a privileged position in regards to parking. Just as students should allocate their time properly to get to class on time, so should administrators and faculty. In fact, they should be better at time management than students.

As for bidding on parking spaces—why stop there? Why not offer early registration to the highest bidder or guarantee access to classes with the best teachers for an extra fee or provide better seating for an additional surcharge or have students pay per minute for advisement with faculty or for reserving the prime tables in the cafeteria?

Bidding for these kinds of services opens up invidious distinctions that are odious to the ethical order. Hierarchy and privilege have a place when they enhance the harmonious, efficient and fair functioning of the social order. So allowing business students to experiment in the way they did is morally questionable; students paying for parking is ethically desirable, as is doing away with faculty and administer reserved spots; and bidding for privileges on campus creates a class structure that the university should have no hand in making.


2 thoughts on “The morality of parking on college campuses

  1. Here at Mercy, one must have a (free) sticker to park, but we do not have any spots reserved for faculty or staff. All struggle equally to park.

  2. This brought back memories of struggling for an hour to find parking 2 miles away from class at Hofstra:) An interesting question–Is it unethical for student parking to be sold to those who can afford the extra expense? I think that if the university was itself an institution that provided all its goods and services for the betterment of its students equally, it might be unethical. But students are not given, for example, meal plans equally–those who can afford it have more money on their cards per semester and so hypothetically can eat more of the better quality products (sushi versus sbarros). Attendance of educational performances on Hofstra’s campus are not free, even for students, so money determines access.
    Especially since driving to Hofstra is a choice (there’s always public transportation!) it seems that charging for spaces if done across the board seems fair. In Queens College, students and faculty pay a semester fee for parking.
    What I think is totally unethical is, as you mention, the granting of the Hofstra business school the right to implement an idea that has not been approved of as official policy and which will have an impact on the community. The bidding process also is problematic.
    Where is the money going? If it is not going back to the university to help with programs, etc. then it is egregiously unfair.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s